Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management
Colorado State University
The arrival of West Nile virus in Colorado has increased interest in mosquito management around the home and on small acreages, and in personal protection from mosquito bites. It is difficult to predict the long term importance of West Nile virus in Colorado. Western equine encephalitis, a closely related mosquito-borne disease has been in the state for many years, although usually at low levels. This, coupled with the observation that West Nile virus tends to be transmitted by significantly more mosquito species than the other encephalitis viruses found in the United States, makes it likely that this new disease is here to stay.
The following is intended to provide more detail on mosquito repellents, mosquito control devices, larvicides (insecticides targeted at mosquito larvae), and adulticides (insecticides targeted at mosquito adults). Products and devices mentioned here may or may not be available for purchase or registered for use in Colorado.
Chemical Mosquito Repellents
In general, mosquito repellents work by interfering with the female mosquito’s ability to detect the environmental cues (for example heat, CO2, and water vapor) that she uses to find a host. Repellents are applied to the skin, used to treat clothing, or released into the air.
There are a variety of synthetic and plant-derived chemicals known to repel mosquitoes. Few are considered safe enough to be applied repeatedly to the skin. The most commonly used synthetic chemical repellent is called deet (N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide). Deet is used by more than 50 million Americans annually for protection from mosquito bites. It has been applied more than one billion times over the 40+ years that it has been commercially available. However, some safety concerns have arisen during this time. As of 1995, there had been 14 cases of neurotoxicity, primarily childhood encephalopathy, associated with frequent and heavy use of deet. However, in most of these cases little effort was made to eliminate possible involvement of the more common known causes of encephalopathy, such as viral infections. Because of the concerns about deet-associated neurotoxicity and dermatitis, the Environmental Protection Agency has released additional guidelines for deet use.
In general, the length of mosquito protection provided by deet increases as the concentration of active ingredient in the product increases, with 100% products providing 8 or more hours of protection under many conditions. An exception is 3M Ultrathon, the commercial version of the product used by the US military, which is a 32% slow release formulation that provides similar protection.
There also are many repellent products containing plant derived chemicals. The most common of these is citronella, although a variety of other essential oils are used as well. In general, these products are just as repellent as deet but do not last as long. An exception may be MosquitoSafe, a new product based on geraniol, which is reported to have similar longevity to that of deet. As long as it is understood that frequent reapplication is necessary, plant-derived repellents should provide the same protection against mosquito bites as deet. Also, it should be noted that these chemicals are generally regarded as safe by the Environmental Protection Agency and therefore have undergone much less safety testing than deet.
There are many studies comparing the effectiveness of mosquito repellents. However, it is difficult to compare among studies because of the variety of methods used in comparing products. Two recent studies are summarized in Tables 1 and 2 to provide an idea of the variety of products available and of the range of efficacy of these products. It is important to keep in mind that these tests usually involve mosquito species that are vectors of virus diseases such as West Nile and that results may not apply to other important vector groups. For example, the plant-derived repellents are generally ineffective against ticks and deet is much less effective against some of the mosquito species that transmit malaria.
Deet and citronella repellents also are available as treated wristbands. However, recent tests indicate that these are ineffective (Tables 1 and 3). Repellents containing the active ingredient permethrin may be applied to clothing, but not the skin, for long lasting protection against mosquitoes, biting flies, and ticks. Permethrin is primarily a fast-acting insecticide and has some repellent activity as well.
Repellents and adulticides (insecticides intended to kill adult mosquitoes) may also be released into the air by burning (coils and candles). Results have been mixed, with some studies indicated moderate biting suppression and others indicating no effect (for example, Table 3). Also, there are some health concerns associated with inhalation of smoke generated in this manner. The mosquito plant is supposed to release repellents into the air as well, but several studies have shown no effect or slightly increased biting rates (for example, Table 3).
Mosquito Control Devices
Mosquito control devices fall into one of two categories. Attract and kill devices use different combinations of ultraviolet light, CO2, and octenol to attract mosquitoes to an electrocuting grid. “Bug zappers” rely on just ultraviolet light for attraction and are ineffective in reducing mosquito biting rates and kill many harmless or beneficial insects, as well. In one study, just 0.13% of the insects killed by one of these devices were female mosquitoes. Another study estimated that up to 350 billion beneficial insects are killed annually in the United States by these devices.
Attract and kill devices become more effective as CO2 and octenol attractants are added. Also, efficacy is strongly influenced by the manner in which the attractants are dispersed from the trap. The most effective of these traps has been shown to be as effective as deet in a contained environment (large outdoor tent) with a known number of mosquitoes. There is no scientific evidence, however, that they are effective in reducing mosquito biting rates outdoors (for example, Table 3, Experiment 1).
The other category of mosquito control devices are the sonic and ultrasonic repellers. Sonic repellers were first marketed in the 1970s. They purported to imitate the flight sound of a male mosquito and worked on the assumption that a mated female mosquito would avoid further contact with males. Other devices were supposed imitate the flight sounds of dragonflies. Although testimonials as to their effectiveness abound, most of these devices have been tested in the laboratory or field and have shown no repellency.
More recently ultrasonic repellers have been developed, which purport to mimic the sounds made by bats. These also have been tested in controlled experiments and found ineffective in reducing mosquito biting rates (for example, Table 3, Experiment 1).
Mosquito larvae are aquatic, and a basic mosquito management recommendation around the home or small acreage is to eliminate any standing water that might serve as a mosquito breeding site. However, there are some potential breeding sites that can not be eliminated or periodically emptied; e. g., fish ponds, water gardens, and stock tanks. These may be treated with larvicides to eliminate mosquito larvae before they emerge from the water as adult mosquitoes.
Treatment of aquatic habitats to control insects can be risky, and much effort has been put into developing environmentally sound products for this use. These are summarized in Table 4. Some products are for use by mosquito control districts, government agencies or licensed pest control operators. However, private individuals should have access to most of these active ingredients in at least one commercial product. Also, availability of these products in retail outlets currently is quite limited. However, the increased public interest in mosquito control due to West Nile virus should increase the number and availability of retail larvicides.
Control of adult mosquitoes in a yard using insecticides can be used as a supplement to, but not as a replacement for more effective methods of mosquito suppression, notably larval management. Currently almost insecticides available for this purpose are pyrethroids.
Adult mosquito suppression can involve two common approaches. The first is an areawide spraying or fogging to kill flying mosquitoes and, presumably, some mosquitoes resting on vegetation. This is best done during peak periods of mosquito flight, often around dusk with the floodwater Aedes. Often a very short-lived pyrethroid insecticide is used for this purpose, such as resmethrin or natural pyrethrins. These break down very rapidly, usually within a couple of hours following application particularly in sunlight. Permethrin, a pyrethroid which has longer residual effectiveness is also used.
There are several limitations to area-wide spraying in a yard. Suppression of adult mosquitoes is usually only a few days at most since reinvasion by mosquitoes from outside the treated area can be rapid. The applications can also damage populations of desirable insects, such as pollinators and natural enemies of insect pests. Contamination of garden crops with unregistered pesticides is also a common problem.
Harborage area treatment involves insecticide application to areas where mosquitoes rest between periods of flight and biting activity. This is usually areas of dense brushy vegetation or tall grass. Insecticides with some persistence, such as permethrin or cypermethrin, are appropriate for this type of application and may kill resting mosquitoes for a week or longer. Effects will be diminished with short-lived insecticides.
Some of the insecticides found in garden centers, nurseries, and other retail outlets that may be useful for adult mosquito control.
Permethrin. Examples of currently marketed products include: Green Thumb Yard & Patio Fogger, Bonide Mosquito Beater Ready-to-Spray, ferti-lome Indoor/Outdoor Multi-Purpose Insect Spray, Safer Mosquito Patrol, Spectracide Bug Stop Multi-Purpose Insect Control Concentrate, Ortho Outdoor Insect Fogger, Raid Yard Guard, Hot Shot Fogger (with tetramethrin), Ford’s InterCept Insect Control/Vegetable, Lawn, Garden Spray Concentrate, Cutter Bug Free Backyard
Pyrethrins. Examples of currently marketed products include: Quik-Kill Home Garden & Pest Spray, Ortho Insect Fogger (with permethrin), Spectracide Bug Stop Insect Killer (aerosol, also contains permethrin), ferti-lome Quik-Kill Home, Garden and Plant Insect Concentrate
Cypermethrin. Examples of currently marketed products include: Vikor Home & Patio Insect Control, Raid Concentrate Fogger
Resmethrin. An example of a product that has been recently market was: Ortho Outdoor Insect Fogger
Copies of these articles are available to Extension personnel. Send a list of desired articles to Frank Peairs, along with a self-addressed, stamped envelope.
Anonymous. 2000. Buzz Off! Consumer Reports, June, pp. 14 – 17.
Anonymous. 2000. The buzz on bug repellents. Good Housekeeping 231(2): 67.
Barnard, D. R. 1999. Repellency of essential oils to mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology. 36(5): 625 – 629.
Chou, J. T., P. A. Rossignol, and J. W. Ayres. 1997. Evaluation of commercial insect repellents on human skin against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology. 34(6): 624 – 630.
Cilek, J. E. and E. T. Schreiber. 1994. Failure of the “mosquito plant” Pelargonium X citrosum ‘van Leenii’ to repel adult Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus in Florida. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 10(4): 473 – 476.
Curtis , C. F. 1986. Fact and fiction in mosquito attraction and repulsion. Parasitology Today 2: 316 – 8.
Curtis, C. F. 1992. Personal protection methods against vectors of disease. Review of Medical and Veterinary Entomology 80: 543 – 53.
Curtis, C. F. , J. D. Lines, Lu Baolin, and A. Renz. 1990. Natural and synthetic repellents. Pp. 75 – 92 in Curtis, C. F., ed. Appropriate Technology for Vector Control. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL.
Foster, W. A. and K. I. Lutes. 1985. Tests of ultrasonic emissions on mosquito attraction to hosts in a flight chamber. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 1(2): 199 – 202.
Fradin, M. S. 1998. Mosquitoes and mosquito repellents: A clinician’s guide. Annals of Internal Medicine. 128(11): 931 – 940.
Fradin, M. S. And J. F. Day. 2002. Comparative efficacy of insect repellents against mosquito bites. New England Journal of Medicine 347: 13 – 18.
Gupta, R. K. And L. C. Rutledge. 1994. Role of repellents in vector control and disease prevention. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 50 (6) Suppl. 82 – 86.
Jensen, T., R. Lampman, M. C. Slamecka, and R. J. Novak. 2000. Field efficacy of commercial antimosquito products in Illinois. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 16(2): 148 – 152.
Kline, D. L. 1999. Comparison of two American Biophysics mosquito traps: The professional and a new counterflow geometry trap. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 15(3): 276 – 282.
Lewis, D. J., W. L. Fairchild and D. J. Leprince. 1982. Evaluation of an electronic mosquito repeller. Canadian Entomologist. 114(8): 699 – 702.
Lillie, T. H., C. E. Schreck and A. J. Rahe. 1988. Effectiveness of personal protection against mosquitoes in Alaska, USA. Journal of Medical Entomology. 25(6): 475 – 478.
Lindsay. L. R., G. A. Surgeoner, J. D. Heal and G. G. James. 1996. Evaluation of the efficacy of 3 percent citronella candles and 5 percent citronella incense for protection against
field populations of Aedes mosquitoes. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 12: 293 – 294.
Matsuda, B. M., G. A. Surgeoner, J. D. Heal, A. O. Tucker and M. J. Maciarello. 1996. Essential oil analysis and field evaluation of the citrosa plant “Pelargonium citrosum” as a repellent against populations of Aedes mosquitoes. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 12(1): 69 – 74.
Osimitz, T. G. and R. H. Grothaus. 1995. The present safety assessment of deet. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 11: 274 – 278.
Osimitz, T. G. and J. V. Murphy. 1997. Neurological effects associated with use of the insect repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET). Journal of Toxicology – Clinical Toxicology. 35(5): 435 – 441.
Qiu, H., H. W. Jun and J. W. McCall. 1998. Pharmocokinetics, formulation and safety of insect repellent N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET): A review. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 14: 12 – 27.
Schreck, C. E. 1985. The status of deet (N,N-diethyl-M-toluamide) as a repellent for Anopheles albimanus. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 1: 98 – 9.
Schreck, C. E., J. C. Webb and G. S. Burden. 1984. Ultrasonic Devices evaluation of repellency to cockroaches and mosquitoes and measurement of sound output. Journal of Environmental Science & Health Part A-Environmental Science & Engineering. 19(5): 521 – 532.
Veltri, J. C., T. G. Osimitz, D. C. Bradford and B. C. Page. 1994. Retrospective analysis of calls to poison control centers resulting from exposure to the insect repellent N,N-diethyl-M-toluamide (DEET) from 1985-1989. Journal of Toxicology – Clinical Toxicology. 32(1): 1 – 16.
Winter, R. 2000. Which bug repellents really work? Consumers Digest, July/August, pp. 20 – 23.
Wright, R. H. 1977. Why mosquito repellents repel. Scientific American 233: 104 – 12.
American Mosquito Control Association (AMCA)
Colorado Mosquito Control
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
New Jersey Mosquito Home Page
Northwest Mosquito Control Association
Clarke Mosquito Control (distributor)
Summit Chemical (Bti Briquets, Mosquito Bits, Mosquito Dunks)
Valent Biosciences (Bactimos, Spherimos, Vectobac, Vectolex products)
Wellmark International (Altosid and Zodiak products)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment – Zoonotic Diseases: Encephalitis
US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey
|Table 1. Summary of effectiveness of mosquito repellents reported by Fradin, M. S. and J. F. Day. 2002. Comparative efficacy of insect repellents against mosquito bites. New England Journal of Medicine 347: 13 – 18.|
|Product1||Active Ingredient||Minutes of Complete
|Off! Deep Woods||23.8% Deet||302||A|
|Sawyer Controlled Release||20% Deet||234||B|
|Off! Skintastic||6.7% Deet||112||C|
|Bite Blocker for Kids||2% Soy oil||95||D|
|Skin-So-Soft Bug Guard Plus||7.5% IR3535||23||E|
|Herbal Armor||12% citronella
2.5% peppermint oil
2% cedar oil
1% lemongrass oil
0.05% geranium oil
|Green Ban for People||10% citronella
2% peppermint oil
|Buzz Away||5% citronella||14||E|
|Skin-So-Soft Bug Guard||0.1% citronella||10||E|
|Skin-So-Soft Moisturizing Sun Care||0.05% citronella||3||F|
|Gone Original Wristband||9.5% Deet||0.3||G|
|Repello Wristbande||9.5% Deet||0.2||H|
|Gone Plus Repelling Wristband||25% citronella||0.2||H|
1May or may not be available for purchase or registered for use in Colorado.
2Letters indicate groups of repellents that are statistically similar; e.g., the six repellents in category E are statistically similar to each other.
|Table 2. Summary of effectiveness of mosquito repellents reported by Consumer Reports in Buzz Off!. June 2000, pp. 14 – 17. (This article also compared products for tick repellency.)|
|Product1||Active Ingredient||Hours of
|3M Ultrathon||33% Deet||12 – 13||Recommended|
|Off! Deep Woods for Sportsmen||100% Deet||11 – 13||Recommended|
|Muskol Ultra 6 Hours||40% Deet||7 – 9||–|
|Ben’s Backyard Formula||20% Deet||6 – 8||–|
|Bugout||15% Deet||4 – 8||–|
|Sawyer Controlled Release Deet Formula||20% Deet||4 – 8||–|
|Cutter Unscented||10% Deet||3 – 6||–|
|Bite Blocker Light Country Scent||2% Soy oil||1 – 4||–|
|Cutter Skinsations||7% Deet||<1 – 3||–|
|Avon-Skin So-Soft Bug Guard Plus
IR3535 with Sunblock
|7.5% IR35352||<1 – 2||–|
|Natrapel||10% citronella||<1 – 1||–|
|Avon-Skin So-Soft Bug Guard||0.1% citronella||<1||–|
1May or may not be available for purchase or registered for use in Colorado.
2Recommendion based on cost per use and effectiveness.
Table 3. Effectiveness of mosquito control products1.
1From Jensen, T., R. Lampman, M. C. Slamecka and R. J. Novak. 2000. Field efficacy of commercial antimosquito products in Illinois. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 16: 148 – 52.
2May or may not be available for purchase or registered for use in Colorado.
3Rank scores in an experiment followed by the same letter are statistically similar. In Experiment 3, averages represent the number of bites in 15 minutes rather than adjusted rank scores.
Table 4. Summary of active ingredients approved for control of mosquito larvae.
|Commercial Names1||Action||Application Sites||Restrictions and Hazards|
|Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (Bti)|
|Aquabac, Bactimos, Bti Briquets, Mosquito Dunks, Mosquito Bits, Teknar, Vectobac||Kills larvae||Flood water, standing water, pastures, etc.||Less effective against larger larvae and in presence of heavy pollution or algae.|
|Spherimos, Vectolex||Kills larvae||Most noncrop and crop mosquito habitats||More effective than Bti in highly polluted environments.|
|Larviciding Oils (highly refined, petroleum based oils)|
|GB-1111, BVA 2||Smother larvae and pupae||Borders and shallow areas of mosquito habitats||Toxic to fish and other aquatic organisms, consult with fish and wildlife authorities before use.|
|Altosid, Zodiac Preventive Mosquito Control||Prevents pupation||Standing water of many types, including agricultural sites and manmade containers.||Toxic to aquatic dipterans (midges, flies, etc.).|
|Monomolecular Surface Film|
|Agnique||Smothers larvae and pupae||Semipermanent and permanent fresh or brackish standing water||May be ineffective where there are persistent unidirectional winds.|
|Abate, Skeeter||OP insecticide kills larvae||Standing water. Not for food, forage or pasture crops.||Toxic to birds and fish. Consult with fish and wildlife authorities before use.|
|1There may be additional commercial names. Products may or may not be available for purchase or registered for use in Colorado.|